Arrests
This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.
On this page:
Writing Template
Issue
I: The issue is whether the government’s arrest was unreasonable seizure.
Analysis
R: For an arrest to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, the arresting officer must have (1) probable cause at the time of the arrest. Additionally, whether (2) a warrant is required depends on whether the arrest occurs in (a) a public place or (b) at the defendant’s home.
A: Here, the arrest occurred [in public/at the defendant’s home].
1. Probable Cause
R: Probable cause exists when the officer has knowledge of reasonably trustworthy facts and circumstances that would lead a prudent person to believe that the arrestee has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime. This standard is objective, requiring facts based on the officer’s personal observations, reliable information from witnesses or victims, or other evidence that would lead a reasonable person to believe a crime occurred.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the officer [had/did not have] probable cause to arrest the defendant.
2. Warrant
a. Public Arrests
R: In public places, an officer generally does not need a warrant to make an arrest. A (1) warrantless arrest in public is justified if the officer has probable cause, regardless of whether the crime was a felony or a misdemeanor. For (2) felonies, a warrant is not required even if the crime was not committed in the officer’s presence. For (3) misdemeanors, however, a warrantless arrest is only permitted if the offense was committed in the officer’s presence.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, a warrant was not required.
C: Therefore, a warrant was required and the officers [had/did not have] one.
b. Home Arrests
R: Generally, (1) a valid warrant is required for an arrest inside a defendant’s home, but exceptions exist (2) when consent is provided or (3) there are exigent circumstances.
i. Warrant
R: A valid arrest warrant for home entry must be (1) issued by a neutral and detached magistrate and (2) supported by probable cause. Additionally, an arrest warrant allows entry into a defendant’s home only if there is reason to believe the defendant is within the home at the time of entry.
A: Here, [apply rules to facts].
C: Therefore, the officer’s had a [valid/invalid] warrant.
ii. Consent
R: An officer may arrest a defendant in their home without a warrant if the defendant or another occupant gives voluntary consent. Voluntariness is assessed based on the totality of the circumstances, including whether the consent was explicit, whether the individual knew they had the right to refuse, and whether the consent was given without coercion or duress.
A: Here, [apply rules to facts].
C: Therefore, the defendant or another occupant [gave/did not give] voluntary consent and [exempts/does not exempt] the requirement for a warrant.
iii. Exigent Circumstances
R: Warrantless home arrests are allowed if (1) the officers have probable cause to arrest, and (2) there is an exigent circumstance such as in situations involving imminent danger, a likelihood of escape, or a risk of the evidence being destroyed.
A: Here, [apply rules to facts].
C: Therefore, an exigent circumstance [existed/did not exist] and [exempts/does not exempt] the requirement for a warrant.
Conclusion
C: Therefore, the government’s arrest [was/was not] an unreasonable seizure.
Usage Notes
JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.
The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.
The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.
The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.
Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.
Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].