Unreasonable Search
This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.
On this page:
Writing Template
Note: A “Fourth Amendment search” is an unreasonable search.
Issue
I: The issue is whether the government’s search was unreasonable (i.e., a Forth Amendment search).
Analysis
R: To conduct a lawful search, the government typically must have a valid warrant, which (1) is supported by probable cause, (2) issued by a neutral and detached magistrate, and (3) properly executed. Alternatively, a warrantless search may be permissible if (4) an exception to the warrant requirement applies.
1. Probable Cause
R: Probable cause exists when the officer has reasonably trustworthy facts and circumstances that would lead a person of reasonable caution to believe that evidence of a crime will be found in the place to be searched. The standard is higher than reasonable suspicion but does not require absolute certainty.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the officer [had/did not have] probable cause.
2. Warrant Issuance
R: A valid warrant must (1) be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate and (2) describe with particularity the place to be searched and the items to be seized.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant [was/was not] properly issued.
3. Warrant Execution
R: The officer must execute the warrant (1) without unreasonable delay and (2) “knock and announce” their presence before entering. If other persons are present in the immediate vicinity, they may be detained but not searched without additional cause.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant [was/was not] properly executed.
4. Exceptions
R: In some situations, a search may be conducted without a warrant if it falls under one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement. The most common exceptions include exigent circumstances, search incident to lawful arrest (SILA), consent, and the automobile exception.
A: Here, the exceptions the government will likely argue are [be familiar with the options listed below so you can list the relevant exceptions here].
[Selected Exception]
[Insert the analysis for the relevant exceptions.]
Conclusion
C: Therefore, the government’s search [was/was not] unreasonable (i.e., a Fourth Amendment search).
Exception Options
Exigent Circumstance
R: A warrantless search or seizure is justified when exigent circumstances exist, meaning that immediate action is required to prevent (1) harm, (2) destruction of evidence, (3) escape of a suspect, or (4) other serious risks.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted by an exigent circumstance.
Search Incident to Lawful Arrest (SILA):
SILA of Person
R: The warrant requirement is exempted by a search incident to a lawful (SILA) arrest if (1) the arrest is valid, (2) the search is conducted contemporaneously with the arrest, and (3) the search is limited to the arrestee’s person and the area within their immediate control (i.e., wingspan) where a weapon might be hidden.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted by a SILA.
SILA of Vehicle
(Allows search of passenger compartment only.)
R: The warrant requirement is exempted for vehicles if the defendant is (1a) unsecured and (1b) within reach of the passenger compartment (i.e., the interior of the vehicle) or (2) if there is a reasonable belief that the vehicle has evidence related to the offense of which the defendant is suspected.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted by a SILA.
Cell Phone
R: The warrant requirement for searching the digital contents of a cell phone incident to a lawful arrest is not automatically exempt. A warrant is generally required unless exigent circumstances exist, such as the need to prevent imminent harm or the destruction of evidence.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted with respect to the phone due to [insert or reference to exigent circumstance].
Consent
R: The warrant requirement is exempted by the defendant’s consent to the search if it is made (1) voluntarily and (2) intelligently based on the totality of the circumstances. Thus, consent must be given without coercion or duress. The individual consenting must have authority over the area to be searched.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted by consent.
Automobile Exception
(Allows search of whole car.)
R: The warrant requirement is exempted if the police have probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence of a crime. The police can search anywhere supported by probable cause, including the passenger compartment, trunk, and locked containers.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted by the automobile exception.
Traffic Stop
(Allows search of immediate reach area.)
R: The warrant requirement is exempted during a traffic stop if the officer has (1) reasonable suspicion that the suspect is dangerous and may access weapons. The (2) search is limited to areas within the suspect’s immediate reach where weapons may be concealed.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted because the evidence was discovered during traffic stop.
Plainview
A warrantless seizure of an item is permitted under the plain view doctrine if (1) the officer is lawfully in the location where the evidence is found, (2) the item’s incriminating nature is immediately apparent, and (3) the officer has lawful access to the item.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted because the evidence was seized while in plain view.
Administrative Search
R: The warrant requirement is exempted if the search was conducted for regulatory, non-criminal purposes. These searches typically occur in highly regulated industries or settings where the government has a substantial interest, such as health and safety inspections, and do not require probable cause.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted because the evidence was discovered during an administrative search.
Detention
R: A brief detention and search (a Terry stop and frisk) is permitted if an officer has reasonable suspicion that the person is involved in criminal activity. During the stop, the officer may frisk the person for weapons if they have a reasonable belief that the person is armed and dangerous. The search must be limited to a pat down unless the officer clearly feels contraband or weapons.
A: Here, [apple rule to facts].
C: Therefore, the warrant requirement [was/was not] exempted because the evidence was discovered during a detention.
Usage Notes
JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.
The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.
The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.
The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.
Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.
Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].