Restriction of the Time, Place, or Manner of Speech

This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.

Writing Template

Issue

I: The issue is whether the regulation restricting the time, place, or manner of speech is constitutional.

Analysis

R: The government’s authority to regulate speech depends on the type of forum in which the speech occurs. The Supreme Court has recognized four types of forums: (1) traditional public forums, (2) designated public forums, (3) non-public forums, and (4) private property.

1. Type of Forum

R: (1) Traditional public forums are areas historically associated with public expression, such as sidewalks, streets, and parks. (2) Designated public forums include spaces not traditionally used for speech but which the government has intentionally opened to the public for expressive activities, such as civic auditoriums, public theaters, or school classrooms. (3) Non-public forums encompass all other public property not dedicated to expressive activities, such as government offices, military bases, airport terminals, and polling places. A designated public forum may be converted into a non-public forum if the government closes it to expressive use. (4) Private property, while not a forum category in the traditional sense, is distinct in terms of how speech may be regulated.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, the type of forum is [traditional public forum/designated public forum/non-public forum/private forum].

2. Constitutionality of the Regulation of Speech

a. Public Forums & Designated Public Forums (Strict)

R: In traditional public forums and designated public forums, the government may impose reasonable restrictions on the time, place, or manner of protected speech if the restrictions (1) are content-neutral regarding subject matter and viewpoint, (2) are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest, and (3) leave open ample alternative channels for communication.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, the regulation [does/does not] satisfy the requirements for constitutionality in a public or designated public forum.

b. Non-Public (or Limited Public) Forums (Intermediate)

R: In non-public forums, the government may regulate speech-related activities if the regulation (1) is viewpoint-neutral and (2) reasonably serves a legitimate governmental interest.

i. Viewpoint-Neutral

R: Viewpoint neutrality requires the government to regulate speech without favoring or opposing particular viewpoints. Content-based distinctions may be permissible, but favoring one side of an issue while suppressing the other violates this principle.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, this element [is/is not] satisfied.

ii. Reasonable

R: Reasonableness is a relatively lenient standard that requires the restriction to have a rational relationship to a legitimate governmental interest. The regulation does not need to be the most reasonable or least restrictive means but must still be grounded in legitimate objectives.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, this element [is/is not] satisfied.

c. Private Property

R: Government regulation of speech on private property is subject to heightened scrutiny. Content-based restrictions on private property, such as bans on yard signs or window displays, are generally impermissible absent a compelling interest.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, the regulation [is/is not] permissible under this standard.

Conclusion

C: Therefore, the regulation restricting the time, place, or manner of speech [is/is not] constitutional.

Usage Notes

JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.

The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.

The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.

The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.

Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.

Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].