Rejection of Offer
This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.
On this page:
Writing Template
Issue
I: The issue is whether the offer was terminated because the offeree rejected the offer.
Analysis
R: Rejection of an offer occurs when an offeree (1) communicates to the offeror a clear intention not to accept the offer, which terminates the offeree’s power of acceptance (2) upon receipt by the offeror. Rejection often occurs through a counteroffer, which proposes a substituted bargain and thereby effectively rejects the original offer, unless otherwise indicated by the offeror.
Mailbox Rule
R: If the rejection is sent by mail, the power of acceptance continues until the rejection reaches the offeror. Though, an acceptance sent after a rejection is only valid if it arrives before the rejection is received.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
Conclusion
C: Therefore, the offer [was/was not] terminated because the offeree rejected the offer.
Usage Notes
JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.
The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.
The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.
The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.
Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.
Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].