Plea Negotiations
This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.
On this page:
Writing Template
Issue
I: The issue is whether the evidence of a plea negotiation is admissible.
Analysis
R: Under Rule 410, evidence of pleas and associated negotiations is inadmissible against a defendant in civil or criminal proceedings. Specifically, this includes (1) a withdrawn guilty plea, (2) a nolo contendere (no contest) plea, (3) statements made in related Rule 11 proceedings, or (4) statements made during plea discussions that did not result in a plea or resulted in a later-withdrawn plea.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
Exceptions
R: Exceptions to this rule allow such evidence when (1) another statement has already been admitted and fairness demands that statements made during the same negotiation be considered together, or (2) in criminal proceedings for perjury or false statements if the defendant made the statement under oath, on record, and with counsel present.
A: Here, [apply rule to facts].
Conclusion
C: Therefore, the evidence of a plea negotiation is [admissible/inadmissible].
Usage Notes
JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.
The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.
The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.
The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.
Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.
Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].