Public Nuisance

This page includes a writing template for analyzing this topic and usage notes to guide its application. In general, the template is designed to serve as a starting point for your analysis. It should be adapted to fit the specific facts of your case and your professor’s preferences.

Writing Template

Issue

I: The issue is whether Defendant is liable for Plaintiff’s injuries under a theory of public nuisance.

Analysis

R: A public nuisance is (1) an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public. A private individual can only bring a claim for public nuisance if (2) they suffer harm that is different in kind from that suffered by the general public. Public nuisances generally involve actions that interfere with public health, safety, peace, comfort, or convenience.

1. Unreasonable

R: An interference is unreasonable if it significantly impacts a right common to the public, such as public safety or the use of public resources, and either (2a) qualifies as a per se nuisance, (2b) does not align with local customs or expectations regarding appropriate activities or conditions, (2c) results from the actor’s failure to exercise reasonable care concerning the risk of causing the interference, or (2d) causes physical damage to the possessor’s land or fixtures. Alternatively, (3) any other activity or condition substantially motivated by malice can qualify as an unreasonable interference.

Per Se Nuisance

R: Certain activities are inherently unreasonable and classified as per se nuisances, such as violating zoning or environmental laws, detonating explosives, or storing hazardous materials. These activities are deemed nuisances regardless of their specific impact.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, the first element [is/is not] satisfied.

2. Different Harm

R: To have standing to sue for public nuisance, a private individual must suffer harm that is different in kind from the harm experienced by the general public. This typically includes (1) individuals whose property is directly impacted or (2) who suffer a unique injury (e.g., property owners near a polluting factory or individuals harmed by unsafe conditions along a public roadway). Simply experiencing the same general inconvenience or discomfort as the public is insufficient to bring a private action.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, the second element [is/is not] satisfied.

Conclusion

C: Therefore, since all the element [are/are not] met, Defendant [is/is not] liable for Plaintiff’s injuries under a theory of public nuisance.

Abatement

R: A private citizen may abate a public nuisance affecting their private property after giving notice to the defendant and allowing a reasonable opportunity to correct the situation. The entry onto another’s land to abate a nuisance must be reasonable, and the force used should be limited to what is necessary to stop the nuisance.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, Plaintiff may recover [enter types of damages].

Damages

R: A plaintiff may recover all damages resulting from the public nuisance, including reduction in property value, personal injury, harm to personal property, or (4) other unique harm caused by the nuisance. These damages may include both past and ongoing harms, and the defendant is liable even for consequences they may not have fully anticipated.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, Plaintiff may recover [enter types of damages].

Injunctive Relief

R: If monetary damages are inadequate or the public nuisance is likely to continue, the courts may issue injunctive relief. In determining whether to grant an injunction, courts weigh (1) the social utility of the defendant’s conduct against (2) the harm caused to the plaintiff and the public. Injunctive relief is favored when the harm is significant and ongoing, and where monetary compensation alone would not prevent future harm.

A: Here, [apply rule to facts].

C: Therefore, Plaintiff may recover [enter types of damages].

Usage Notes

JurisJotter templates synthesize legal principles into a practical format that supports the development of well-structured, point-rich analyses in a timed exam.

The template features (1) headers identifying the overall issue, analysis, and conclusion. If the analysis begins with an umbrella rule that identifies elements, factors, or steps of the analysis, it will be followed by subheaders that signpost the analysis of each component.

The template also features (2) IRAC labels at the beginning of each paragraph. These headers and labels are included for educational purposes, offering guidance on structuring your analysis. Your usage of the headers is optional but can be helpful to readers. We advise against including the IRAC labels in submitted work.

The templates serve as a general guide for writing and should be adapted to align with (1) your specific factual circumstances and (2) your professor’s preferences, particularly if your professor provides explicit formulations of rules or analyses. For example, you may add or subtract an element or modify its language. Regardless of whether your professor provides explicit formulations, (3) this template will assist you in crafting point-rich analyses.

Please note that these templates are writing aids and not finished products. They are efficiently designed for exam essays to demonstrate conceptual understanding; thus, they are not comprehensive outlines with historical context or dicta.

Questions or comments? Reach out at [email protected].